Multi-stage system for verification of container contents

ABSTRACT

A multi-stage process utilizing one or more radiation sensors on a distributed network for the detection and identification of radiation, explosives, and special materials within a shipping container. The sensors are configured as nodes on the network. The system collects radiation data from one or more nodes. The collected radiation data is dynamically adjusted according to at least one of a plurality of background radiation data based on a determined background environment about the container. The collected and adjusted radiation data is compared to one or more stored spectral images representing one or more isotopes to identify one or more isotopes present. The identified one or more isotopes present are corresponded to possible materials or goods that they represent.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 11/930,229, filed on Oct. 31, 2007, which is acontinuation-in-part of, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S.patent application Ser. No. 11/564,193, filed on Nov. 28, 2006, which isbased on, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 60/759,332, filed on Jan. 17, 2006, by inventorDavid L. FRANK, and entitled “Sensor Interface Unit And Method ForAutomated Support Functions For CBRNE Sensors”; and further which isbased on, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 60/759,331, filed on Jan. 17, 2006, by inventorDavid L. FRANK, and entitled “Method For Determination Of ConstituentsPresent From Radiation Spectra And, If Available, Neutron And AlphaOccurrences”; and further which is based on, and claims priority from,prior co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/759,373,filed on Jan. 17, 2006, by inventor David L. FRANK, and entitled“Distributed Sensor Network with Common Platform for CBRNE Devices; andfurther which is based on, and claims priority from, prior co-pendingU.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/759,375, filed on Jan. 17,2006, by inventor David L. FRANK, and entitled Advanced ContainerVerification System; and furthermore which is a continuation-in-part of,and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S. patent application Ser.No. 11/291,574, filed on Dec. 1, 2005, which is a continuation-in-partof, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 10/280,255, filed on Oct. 25, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,005,982issued Feb. 28, 2006, that was based on prior U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/347,997, filed on Oct. 26, 2001, now expired, andwhich further is based on, and claims priority from, prior co-pendingU.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/631,865, filed on Dec. 1,2004, now expired, and which furthermore is based on, and claimspriority from, prior co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.60/655,245, filed on Feb. 23, 2005, now expired, and which furthermoreis based on, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 60/849,350, filed on Oct. 4, 2006, and whichfurthermore is based on, and claims priority from, prior co-pending U.S.patent application Ser. No. 11/363,594 filed on Feb. 27, 2006, now U.S.Pat. No. 7,142,109 issued Nov. 28, 2006; the collective entiredisclosure of the above-identified applications being herebyincorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates in general to shipping container contentsdetection systems, and more particularly to a noninvasive system andmethod to detect and identify hazardous materials within containers,such as radiation and/or neutron emitting materials, explosives, andspecial materials such as highly enriched uranium, and further toidentify the normally occurring radiological materials withincontainers.

2. Description of Related Art

Current attempts at providing radiation, neutron, explosives, andspecial materials, detection systems to verify shipping containers, suchas those that have been mounted on the gantry crane arms, have a limitedtime to identify the isotopes present. Radiation sensor systems fordetecting and identifying radiological materials held within shippingcontainers may not have the exposure time required to specificallyidentify all of the isotope types that may be present. The limited timeto detect and identify the isotopes present may affect the ability toevaluate the validity of the contents. The limited time for intervalprovided by current shipping container detection systems, such as foruse with gantry cranes, detrimentally affect the commercial viability ofradiation, neutron, explosives, and special materials, detection systemsand cause the containers to be manually interrogated which results innegative impacts to the flow of commerce.

Therefore a need exists to overcome the problems with the prior art asdiscussed above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a multi-stagedetection system and method detects gamma and neutron radiationproviding additional data capture times when radiological materials aredetected and a secondary position for further analysis. The gamma andneutron detectors mounted on the spreader bar of a gantry crane providean initial identification of the presence of radiological materialswithin a shipping container. The spreader bar typically provides up to30 seconds of close proximity for the radiation sensors to analyze theshipping container. The radiation data captured is analyzed for specificisotope identification. Should the system require more data to completethe analysis, the spreader bar contact with the shipping container isextended to enable additional data capture. Furthermore, if the shippingcontainer requires further analysis time to determine the specificisotopes present, an embodiment of the present invention provides asecondary radiation analysis position comprised of an array of radiationsensors deployed to allow the targeted container to be further analyzed.The present invention, according to an embodiment, allows an extendedtime for radiation analysis for those shipping containers whereradiological materials have been detected and where the normal flow ofthe gantry crane movement does not allow for a complete analysis.Additionally, an embodiment of the present invention provides for asecondary radiation analysis position where the additional time foranalysis is required beyond that provided at the gantry crane. Anotherembodiment provides for tracking and monitoring of the targeted shippingcontainer as it moves from the spreader bar to the secondary radiationanalysis position.

In order to verify whether radioactive materials are concealed within ashipping container, isotope sensing and identification systems can bedeployed in association with a container, such as with a crane assemblyused to lift shipping and transfer containers. Typically, the containercrane includes a hoist-attachment which engages the shipping container.An isotope sensing and identification system would consist of one ormore gamma and neutron detectors that are mounted on the cranehoist-attachment (or on the spreader arm) and provide detailed radiationspectral data to a computer system performing spectral analysis for thedetection and identification of isotope(s) that are present in thecontainers. Many normally occurring radiological materials exist incommon goods and cause radiation detection systems to produce falsealarms.

The first stage of this process is the detection of the presence ofradiological materials within the container. The second stage is toidentify the specific isotopes that are present. This second stage maybe completed within the 30 second period that is typical for thespreader bar of a gantry crane to be attached to the shipping containeras it is moved to and from the vessel. For those instances whereadditional time is required to collect radiological data for theidentification of the isotopes present, the time that the spreader baris connected to the shipping container may be extended. This could beaccomplished in a variety of ways. For example, the spreader barmovement could be slowed or the spreader bar could remain connected tothe container for an extended period of time after being placed intoposition.

By identifying the specific isotope(s) that are present allows thesystem to also identify the types of goods or materials that theisotopes represent. With a list of potential goods that represent theidentified isotopes, the system can perform a comparison between theidentified goods or materials and the shipping container manifest todetermine if the radiological material(s) present match the expectedmaterials within the container. The process of 1) identifying theisotope(s) that are within a container, 2) identifying the goods ormaterials that the isotopes represent and 3) verifying the contents ofthe manifest against the identified goods, allows the efficientverification of the container without negative impact to the flow ofcommerce.

According to another embodiment, a neutron pulse device is positioned onthe spreader bar to provide active analysis to determine if shieldedmaterials such as highly enriched uranium, explosives, or othermaterials are present.

According to another embodiment, the radiation sensor system has asecondary position deployed for further analysis of a shipping containerwhere radiological materials have been detected and further analysis isrequired to determine the specific isotopes that are present. Thissecondary position along with the spreader bar radiation sensor positionare all part of an integrated radiological analysis system. Eachradiological analysis system is configured as a node on a multi-nodesystem. The data acquired from the spreader bar sensors is used inconjunction with the data acquired at the secondary position foranalysis of the shipping container contents. The shipping container ismonitored as it is moved from the spreader bar position to the secondaryposition. The shipping container may be monitored through the use ofCCTV cameras or wireless tracking devices such as radio frequencyidentification devices.

According to another embodiment, the radiation sensor positions aremonitored by a central monitoring station. This central monitoringstation may include an interactive graphic display illustrating the mapof the port, the placement of the gantry cranes, the placement of thesecondary position(s), video cameras and the position of the targetedshipping container as it moves across the port to the secondaryposition.

According to another embodiment, the radiation sensors for each node onthe system are connected to a processor system that collects andanalyzes the gamma energy levels and spectral data detected and thensends this data to a spectral analysis engine. Data from each node isindividually addressed and sent to the spectral analysis engine to allowfor analysis of individual detector data or detector group data. Theanalysis engine can combine data from multiple nodes for use inanalyzing the shipping container contents.

The processor system and a data collection system are electricallycoupled with the sensors of each node to collect signals from the arrayof neutron sensor devices to form histograms with the collected spectraldata. The histograms are used by the spectral analysis system toidentify the isotopes that are present.

The spectral analysis system, according to an embodiment, includes aninformation processing system and software that analyzes the datacollected and identifies the isotopes that are present. The spectralanalysis software consists of more that one method to providemulti-confirmation of the isotopes identified. Should more than oneisotope be present, the system identifies the ratio of each isotopepresent. Examples of methods that can be used for spectral analysis suchas in the spectral analysis software according to an embodiment of acontainer verification system, include: 1) a Margin Setting method asdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,731; and 2) a LINSCAN method (a linearanalysis of spectra method) as described in U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/759,331, filed on Jan. 17, 2006, by inventor David L.Frank, and entitled “Method For Determination Of Constituents PresentFrom Radiation Spectra And, If Available, Neutron And AlphaOccurrences”; the collective entire teachings of which being hereinincorporated by reference.

A user interface of the information processing system, according to anembodiment, provides a graphic view of the radiation spectra detectedand the isotopes identified. The user interface allows a user of thesystem to view, among other things, the individual detectors, detectorgroups, individual sensors, and sensor groups, individual nodes and acombination of multiple nodes to quickly identify maintenanceconditions, radiation detected, and isotopes identified.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a picture depicting a container in proximity to a crane armassembly (or a spreader bar) with sensors in sensor housings, inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram of a secondary radiation verificationposition.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a data collectionand analysis system, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a centralmonitoring system, in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating radiation sensors deployed in a pushpull bar configuration of a crane spreader bar, according to anembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating radiation sensors deployed about themain body of a crane spreader bar, according to an embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating multiple background radiationenvironment effects.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating dynamic background radiation effectscompensation.

FIG. 9 is a formula useful for dynamic background radiation effectscompensation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While the specification concludes with claims defining the features ofthe invention that are regarded as novel, it is believed that theinvention will be better understood from a consideration of thefollowing description in conjunction with the drawing figures, in whichlike reference numerals are carried forward. It is to be understood thatthe disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, whichcan be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural andfunctional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted aslimiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representativebasis for teaching one of ordinary skill in the art to variously employthe present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.Further, the terms and phrases used herein are not intended to belimiting; but rather, to provide an understandable description of theinvention.

The terms “a” or “an”, as used herein, are defined as one, or more thanone. The term “plurality”, as used herein, is defined as two, or morethan two. The term “another”, as used herein, is defined as at least asecond or more. The terms “including” and/or “having”, as used herein,are defined as comprising (i.e., open language). The term “coupled”, asused herein, is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly,and not necessarily mechanically. The terms “program”, “computerprogram”, “software application”, and the like as used herein, aredefined as a sequence of instructions designed for execution on acomputer system. A program, computer program, or software applicationmay include a subroutine, a function, a procedure, an object method, anobject implementation, an executable application, an applet, a servlet,a source code, an object code, a shared library/dynamic load libraryand/or other sequence of instructions designed for execution on acomputer system. A data storage means, as defined herein, includes manydifferent types of computer readable media that allow a computer to readdata therefrom and that maintain the data stored for the computer to beable to read the data again. Such data storage means can include, forexample, non-volatile memory, such as ROM, Flash memory, batterybacked-up RAM, Disk drive memory, CD-ROM, DVD, and other permanentstorage media. However, even volatile storage such as RAM, buffers,cache memory, and network circuits are contemplated to serve as suchdata storage means according to different embodiments of the presentinvention.

The present invention, according to an embodiment, overcomes problemswith the prior art by providing a multi-stage radiation verificationprocess for the contents of a shipping container. The radiation sensordata collected at each stage of the verification process is used toenable detection and identification of the specific isotopes that arepresent in a container under examination.

A noninvasive container contents detection and verification system,according to an embodiment of the present invention, operates withouthaving to enter the cavity of a container under examination. The systemcan include multiple radiation sensor systems that use integrateddigital sensors for Gamma and neutron detection, and with a spectralanalysis capability to identify the specific isotope(s) of materials incontainers. The multi-stage system provides for monitoring and trackingof targeted containers that are delivered to a secondary verificationstation. The multi-stage system provides for network connections betweenthe spreader bar position and the secondary verification position toenable information integration. Such a multi-stage system can alsoinclude detection and identification of explosives and special materialsin containers. These special materials may include highly enricheduranium.

An embodiment of the invention includes radiation sensors deployed onthe spreader bar of a gantry crane to provide radiation detection andisotope identification for the contents of the shipping container. Thespreader bar is connected to the shipping container for approximately 30seconds as the container is moved to or from the vessel at a port. Themulti-stage radiation verification system enables radiation detectionand analysis of the contents within the shipping container within thenormal 30 seconds while the spreader bar is connected to the shippingcontainer. The multi-stage system also allows for an extendedtime-period for the spreader bar to stay connected to the shippingcontainer when radiological materials have been detected that theinitial 30 second analysis does not allow adequate time for theidentification of the isotopes present. In addition, the multi-stageradiation verification system uses a secondary sensor position forcontinued analysis of the shipping container if additional time isneeded beyond the extended time provided at the spreader bar. Theshipping container may be tracked as it moves from the spreader barposition to the secondary position. An example of tracking andmonitoring devices include CCTV cameras and wireless trackingtechnologies such as radio frequency identification devices.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a crane armassembly mounted sensor system may comprise a node within a distributednetwork of radiation sensor positions. An example of such a system isdescribed in U.S. Patent Application No. 60/759,373, Filed on Jan. 17,2006, and entitled “Distributed Sensor Network With Common Platform ForCBRNE Devices”, the entire teachings of which being incorporated byreference.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a crane arm(spreader bar) mounted radiation sensor system, as described in patentapplication Ser. No. 11/363,594 filed on Feb. 27, 2006 is used for thedetection and first stage of isotope identification for detectedradiological material within a shipping container.

A sensor concentrator unit may be used to connect multiple sensors in agroup and enable efficient connection to the central processor forspectral analysis. This configuration could utilize a sensor interfaceunit (SIU) that is comprised of an integrated multi-channel analyzer,high voltage power supply, voltage system and communications interface.This SIU configuration uses a concentrator unit to combine multiplesensors into a concentrated communications channel for connection to thecentral processor. The communications concentrator provides individualIP addressed for each sensor group. An example of the concentrator unitis a device that provides multiple USB ports for sensor connection andconcentrates the USB ports into an Ethernet connection for backhaul.

An embedded processor unit may be used to connect multiple sensors in agroup and enable efficient connection to the central processor forspectral analysis. This configuration could utilize a sensor interfaceunit (SIU) that is comprised of an integrated multi-channel analyzer,high voltage power supply, voltage system and communications interface.This SIU configuration is connected to an embedded processor supportingmultiple sensors and providing one or more communications channel(s) forconnection to the central processor. The embedded processor providesindividual IP addressed for each sensor.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the time thatthe spreader bar is connected to the shipping container may be extendedto enable further analysis and radiological data acquisition.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the time thatthe spreader bar is connected to the shipping container may be extendedto enable further analysis and radiological data acquisition.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, a secondaryradiation verification system could be deployed as another node of theradiation verification system to enable further analysis andradiological data acquisition.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, the targetedshipping container may be tracked and or monitored as it moves to thesecondary radiation verification system.

Described now is an example of a multi-stage radiation detection andidentification system with one node mounted on a spreader bar of a craneassembly and another node deployed as a secondary radiation verificationposition. An example of a process for operation of the system is alsodiscussed.

A radiation detection and identification system deployed on a crane arm(or spreader bar) 102, such as illustrated in FIG. 1, provides the firstand second stages of a multi-stage radiation verification system. FIG. 1illustrates example installation positions for various sensor housings101, 110. Certain inventive features and advantages of exemplaryembodiments of a radiation detection and identification system, such asdeployed in connection with a crane assembly or other shipping containerhandling operation, will be discussed below. However, it is assumed thatthe reader has an understanding of radiation and sensor technologies.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, an example of a multi-node radiationverification system is shown. The system includes a spreader bar node(as shown in FIG. 1) and a secondary radiation verification node 202 asshown in FIG. 2. A truck 220 carries a container 222 that contains cargo215 inside the container 222. Multiple radiation sensors 202 aredeployed on either or both sides of the container 222 to enable furtheranalysis of the contents 215. A power distribution station 203 providespower to the sensors. A communication distribution module 204 couplesignals between the multiple radiation sensors 202 and a distributionnetwork 210 of which is further described in FIG. 3. Once a containercargo 215 is identified at the spreader bar stage as suspect, thecontainer 222 is tracked and moved from the spreader bar position (asshown in FIG. 1) to the secondary verification position (as shown inFIG. 2) for further analysis. In this example, the secondaryverification position includes positioning the container 222 by using atruck to move the container 222 to the multiple radiation sensors 202deployed on either or both sides of the container 222.

With reference to FIG. 3, a data collection system 310, in this example,is communicatively coupled via cabling, wireless communication link,and/or other communication link 305 with each of the gamma radiationsensor devices 301 and neutron sensor devices 302 in each sensor unit,and with each of the neutron pulse sensor device(s) 303. The datacollection system 310 includes an information processing system withdata communication interfaces 324 that collect signals from theradiation sensor units 301, 302, and from the neutron pulse device(s)303. The collected signals, in this example, represent detailed spectraldata from each sensor device that has detected radiation.

The data collection system 310 is modular in design and can be usedspecifically for radiation detection and identification, or for datacollection for explosives and special materials detection andidentification.

The data collection system 310 is communicatively coupled with a localcontroller and monitor system 312. The local system 312 comprises aninformation processing system that includes a computer, memory, storage,and a user interface 314 such a display on a monitor and a keyboard, orother user input/output device. In this example, the local system 312also includes a multi-channel analyzer 330 and a spectral analyzer 340.

The multi-channel analyzer (MCA) 330 comprises a device composed of manysingle channel analyzers (SCA). The single channel analyzer interrogatesanalog signals received from the individual radiation detectors 301,302, and determines whether the specific energy range of the receivedsignal is equal to the range identified by the single channel. If theenergy received is within the SCA the SCA counter is updated. Over time,the SCA counts are accumulated. At a specific time interval, amulti-channel analyzer 330 includes a number of SCA counts, which resultin the creation of a histogram. The histogram represents the spectralimage of the radiation that is present. The MCA 330, according to oneexample, uses analog to digital converters combined with computer memorythat is equivalent to thousands of SCAs and counters and is dramaticallymore powerful and cheaper.

The histogram is used by the spectral analysis system 340 to identifyisotopes that are present in materials contained in the container underexamination. One of the functions performed by the informationprocessing system 312 is spectral analysis, performed by the spectralanalyzer 340, to identify the one or more isotopes, explosives orspecial materials contained in a container under examination. Withrespect to radiation detection, the spectral analyzer 340 compares oneor more spectral images of the radiation present to known isotopes thatare represented by one or more spectral images 350 stored in the isotopedatabase 322. By capturing multiple variations of spectral data for eachisotope there are numerous images that can be compared to one or morespectral images of the radiation present. The isotope database 322 holdsthe one or more spectral images 350 of each isotope to be identified.These multiple spectral images represent various levels of acquisitionof spectral radiation data so isotopes can be compared and identifiedusing various amounts of spectral data available from the one or moresensors. Whether there are small amounts (or large amounts) of dataacquired from the sensor, the spectral analysis system 340 compares theacquired radiation data from the sensor to one or more spectral imagesfor each isotope to be identified. This significantly enhances thereliability and efficiency of matching acquired spectral image data fromthe sensor to spectral image data of each possible isotope to beidentified.

It should be noted that in one embodiment, the spectral analysisdiscussed above also spectrally analyzes radiation data that has beencollected by one or more sensors over a frequency range and anassociated collected non-zero neutron count. The analysis of theradiation data and a collected non-zero neutron count comprisessubtracting radiation data corresponding to the collected non-zeroneutron count from the radiation data in the collected at least onespectral data set.

Furthermore, the spectral images corresponding to the container can becombined to create a composite spectral image represented by ahistogram. In this embodiment, isotope identification can includespectrally analyzing the spectral image within the histogramrepresenting the composite spectral image associated with the containerand the contents within the container. A plurality of spectral images,each representing an isotope, is compared to at least a portion of thespectral image in the histogram. The spectral analysis process thenidentifies a first spectral image from the plurality of spectral imagesthat substantially matches at least a portion of the spectral image inthe histogram. This identified first spectral image is then subtractedfrom the spectral image in the histogram. This results in a remainingspectral image in the histogram. The comparing, identifying, andsubtracting processes are repeated for each subsequent spectral image inthe plurality of spectral images. Stated differently, after eachsubsequent spectral image is identified in at least a portion of theremaining spectral image in the histogram, the subsequent identifiedspectral image is subtracted from the remaining spectral image in thehistogram.

Once the one or more possible isotopes are determined present in theradiation detected by the sensor(s), the information processing system312 can compare the isotope mix against possible materials, goods,and/or products, that may be present in the container under examination.Additionally, a manifest database 315 includes a detailed description ofthe contents of each container that is to be examined. The manifest 315can be referred to by the information processing system 312 to determinewhether the possible materials, goods, and/or products, contained in thecontainer match the expected authorized materials, goods, and/orproducts, described in the manifest for the particular container underexamination. This matching process, according to an embodiment of thepresent invention, is significantly more efficient and reliable than anycontainer contents monitoring process in the past.

The spectral analysis system 340, according to an embodiment, includesan information processing system and software that analyzes the datacollected and identifies the isotopes that are present. The spectralanalysis software consists of more that one method to providemulti-confirmation of the isotopes identified. Should more than oneisotope be present, the system identifies the ratio of each isotopepresent. Examples of methods that can be used for spectral analysis suchas in the spectral analysis software according to an embodiment of acontainer contents verification system, include: 1) a margin settingmethod as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,731; and 2) a LINSCAN method(a linear analysis of spectra method) as described in U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 60/759,331, filed on Jan. 17, 2006, by inventorDavid L. Frank, and entitled “Method For Determination Of ConstituentsPresent From Radiation Spectra And, If Available, Neutron And AlphaOccurrences”; the collective entire teachings of which being hereinincorporated by reference.

With respect to analysis of collected data pertaining to explosivesand/or special materials, the spectral analyzer 340 and the informationprocessing system 312 compare identified possible explosives and/orspecial materials to the manifest 315 by converting the stored manifestdata relating to the shipping container under examination to expectedexplosives and/or radiological materials and then by comparing theidentified possible explosives and/or special materials with theexpected explosives and/or radiological materials. If the systemdetermines that there is no match to the manifest for the container thenthe identified possible explosives and/or special materials areunauthorized. The system can then provide information to systemsupervisory personnel to alert them to the alarm condition and to takeappropriate action.

Removal of Background Radiation Effects

Dynamic Background

The background radiation at a seaport and more specifically the changingbackground associated with a moving container across land, sea, vesselsand at different heights, poses a specific challenge to radiationdetection and isotope identification. According to one embodiment of thepresent invention, this issue is addressed through the use of a dynamicbackground method used to compensate for the changing backgroundeffects. This method applies continuous background updates against themain background data. Different weights and intervals can be varied forthe background updates to achieve the appropriate dynamic background forthe specific application. An example formula is provided below, and alsoshown in FIG. 9.Bi(X)=Ai(X)*alpha+Bi−1(X)*(1−alpha)  (1)

Bi (X) = Ai(X) * alpha + Bi − 1 (X) * (1− alpha) New Dynamic Snap ShotLearning Previous Differential Background of Background Rate Background

As shown in FIG. 7, background radiation effects can vary depending on avarying background environment that can be experienced by the sensors,such as the sensors located at the spreader bar and/or sensors locatedat locations relative to changing background environments. For example,the sensors at the spreader bar can be over water, over a ship, highover the ground, low over the ground, or inside the ship. Thesedifferent background environments can affect the radiation detection andisotope identification. Radiation from the sky should typically bepredominant and remain normal during spreader bar movement. Also,sensors at the spreader bar should typically be protected by thecontainer under examination and the spreader bar from most of thebackground radiation coming from the ground, water, and over the ship.Accordingly, a new and novel approach to compensate for the changingbackground effects applies continuous background updates against themain background data.

As shown in FIG. 8, the dynamic background is comprised of the primarybackground and the incremental background. As radiation data iscollected and processed for analysis, according to one embodiment of thepresent invention, the background environment effects can be subtractedfrom the collected data using continuous background updates against amain background data. This dynamic background compensation approach hasthe advantages of increased speed and sensitivity for dynamic backgroundcapture, memory efficiency in processing collected data, and flexibilityto adjust to variable system parameters and to address specificapplications. Further, an information processing system can learn aparticular process used in locating sensors during data collection, suchas to anticipate the changes in background effects in a normal operationand movement of the spreader bar. Additionally, the dynamic backgroundcompensation approach can provide a continuous differential subtractionof the effects of varying background environment. This approach enhancesthe quality of the analyzed data leading to better and more reliableradiation detection and isotope identification.

According to an alternative embodiment of the present invention, amultiple background analysis approach can be used to remove varyingbackground effects on the collected data. In one example, a GPS detectoris mechanically coupled to the structure supporting the moving sensors,such as the crane spreader bar, and provides continuous location data(of the spreader bar) to an information processing system that isprocessing the collected data. The location of the spreader bar, forexample, can indicate the type of background environment that is beingexperienced by the sensors at the spreader bar. The GPS detectoroperates in a well known manner and can provide both geographic locationinformation and elevation information. Knowing the elevation of thespreader bar above, say, ground or sea level, can indicate the type ofbackground effects that are experienced by the sensors at the spreaderbar. The elevation information, and/or the geographic locationinformation, can be, for example, compared against an expected map ofstructures and background environments in proximity to the spreader bar.These expected background environments correspond to background effectsthat can, for example, be subtracted from the collected data to providebetter and more reliable data for analysis leading to better and morereliable radiation detection and isotope identification. Alternativelocation detection devices, including mechanical devices and/orelectrical devices and/or manual data entry, can be used by the systemto track changing backgrounds and corresponding background effects oncollected data.

Another use of the elevation information and the geographic locationinformation by an information processing system is for controlling thetriggers and effects of devices used to collect the radiation data. Forexample, a neutron pulse may be generated by a neutron pulse device thatis included in the sensor system deployed at the spreader bar or on thegantry crane to provide an active analysis whereby gamma feedbackfollowing the neutron pulse can identify shielded radiological materialssuch as highly enriched uranium, explosives or illicit drugs, insidecontainers. However, a particular system implementation may limit theactivation of the neutron pulse device to particular geographic areasand/or elevations above ground and/or sea level. For example, a neutronpulse device can be controlled to remain inactive while the crane and/orspreader bar are in close proximity to a crane operator's cabin or to aprotected area such as one normally occupied by people. The flexibilityand dynamic adjustment to different operational environments whileenhancing the speed and reliability of data analysis, as discussedabove, is a significant advantage of the present inventive system thatwas not available in the past.

The user interface 314 allows service or supervisory personnel tooperate the local system 312 and to monitor the status of radiationdetection and identification of isotopes and/or the detection of RFsignals by the collection of sensor units 301, 302 and 303 deployed onthe frame structure, such as on the crane arm assembly (or spreaderbar).

The user interface 314, for example, can present to a user arepresentation of the collected received returning signals, or theidentified possible explosives and/or special materials in the shippingcontainer under examination, or any system identified unauthorizedexplosives and/or special materials contained within the shippingcontainer under examination, or any combination thereof.

The data collection system can also be communicatively coupled with aremote control and monitoring system 318 such as via a network 316. Theremote system 318 comprises an information processing system that has acomputer, memory, storage, and a user interface 320 such as a display ona monitor and a keyboard, or other user input/output device. The network316 comprises any number of local area networks and/or wide areanetworks. It can include wired and/or wireless communication networks.This network communication technology is well known in the art. The userinterface 320 allows remotely located service or supervisory personnelto operate the local system 312 and to monitor the status of shippingcontainer verification by the collection of sensor units 301, 302 and303 deployed on the frame structure, such as on the crane arm assembly(or spreader bar). The central monitoring system can display theposition of the shipping container as it is moved to the secondaryposition through the use of CCTV cameras (350) or shipping containertracking systems (355).

A neutron pulse device can be included in the sensor system deployed onthe spreader bar or on the gantry crane to provide an active analysiswhereby gamma feedback identifies shielded radiological materials suchas highly enriched uranium, explosives or illicit drugs.

Referring to FIG. 4, an example of a multi-node radiation verificationsystem includes multiple spreader bar radiation verification systems(401) and secondary radiation verification nodes (404), operationscenter (408), container tracking system (410) and CCTV (402) camerasthat are interconnected by a data network (405). In some cases aforklift truck is used to move the containers around the terminal. Theforklift truck (420) is equipped with a spreader bar and can beconfigured as a wireless radiation verification node.

Referring to FIG. 5, an example of a spreader bar with radiation sensorsinstalled in the push pull bars is shown. In FIG. 5, one or moreradiation sensors are integrated within the push pull bar 501. Theradiation sensors are enclosed in a box with shock absorbing connectors511. The gamma sensors 512 are shock mounted within the box on the lowerside of the unit. The one or more gamma sensors comprise sensorresolution of 7% or better at 662 kev. The neutron sensors 514 and thesupporting electronics 513 are mounted on the top side of the box.Alternative mounting arrangements of the one or more radiation sensors,the gamma sensors 512, the neutron sensors 514, and the supportingelectronics 513, relative to the push pull bar 501 should become obviousto those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the present discussion.

Referring to FIG. 6, an example of a spreader bar with radiation sensorsinstalled in the main unit 601 is shown. In the example of FIG. 6, theradiation sensors are integrated within the main unit 601. The radiationsensors are enclosed in a box with shock absorbing connectors 611. Thegamma sensors 612 are shock mounted within the box on the lower side ofthe unit. The neutron sensors 613 and the supporting electronics 614 aremounted on the top side of the box. Alternative mounting arrangements ofthe one or more radiation sensors, the gamma sensors 612, the neutronsensors 613, and the supporting electronics 614, relative to the mainunit 601 should become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art inview of the present discussion.

By operating the system remotely, such as from a central monitoringlocation, a larger number of sites can be safely monitored by a limitednumber of supervisory personnel. Besides monitoring container handlingoperations such as from crane arm assemblies, as illustrated in theexample of FIG. 1, it should be clear that many different applicationscan be deployed for the initial detection and identification stages forcontainer analysis. For example, fork lift truck mounted sensor unitscommunicating with a remote monitoring system allow radiation detectionand identification where large amounts of cargo are moved and handled,such as at ports, railway, and intermodal stations, and at ships,airplanes, trucks, warehouses, and other carrier environments, and atsuch other places that have large amounts of cargo to handle as shouldbe understood by those of ordinary skill in the art in view of thepresent discussion.

Additionally, the system monitoring function can be combined to monitormore than radiation and explosives. Other types of hazardous elementscan be monitored in combination with the radiation detection bycombining appropriate sensors and detectors for these other types ofhazardous elements with the radiation sensor units and monitoring systemaccording to alternative embodiments of the present invention.

The preferred embodiments of the present invention can be realized inhardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. A systemaccording to a preferred embodiment of the present invention can berealized in a centralized fashion in one computer system, or in adistributed fashion where different elements are spread across severalinterconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system—or otherapparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein—issuited. A typical combination of hardware and software could be ageneral purpose computer system with a computer program that, when beingloaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carriesout the methods described herein.

An embodiment according to present invention can also be embedded in acomputer program product, which comprises all the features enabling theimplementation of the methods described herein, and which—when loaded ina computer system—is able to carry out these methods. Computer programmeans or computer program in the present context mean any expression, inany language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended tocause a system having an information processing capability to perform aparticular function either directly or after either or both of thefollowing a) conversion to another language, code or, notation; and b)reproduction in a different material form.

Each computer system may include one or more computers and at least acomputer readable medium allowing a computer to read data, instructions,messages or message packets, and other computer readable informationfrom the computer readable medium. The computer readable medium mayinclude non-volatile memory, such as ROM, Flash memory, Disk drivememory, CD-ROM, and other permanent storage. Additionally, a computerreadable medium may include, for example, volatile storage such as RAM,buffers, cache memory, and network circuits. Furthermore, the computerreadable medium may comprise computer readable information in atransitory state medium such as a network link and/or a networkinterface, including a wired network or a wireless network, that allow acomputer to read such computer readable information.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been disclosed,those having ordinary skill in the art will understand that changes canbe made to the specific embodiments without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is not to berestricted, therefore, to the specific embodiments, and it is intendedthat the appended claims cover any and all such applications,modifications, and embodiments within the scope of the presentinvention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for detecting and identifyingradioactive materials within the one or more containers, the methodcomprising: providing a background radiation data set comprising aplurality of background radiation data corresponding to a plurality ofdifferent background environments in proximity to a container;collecting, by a plurality of radiation sensors, at least one spectraldata set representing radiation data associated with the container andits contents, the container being located in proximity to the pluralityof radiation sensors; dynamically adjusting the collected at least onespectral data set according to at least one of the plurality ofbackground radiation data based on a determined background environmentof the plurality of different background environments in proximity tothe container; spectrally analyzing the collected at least one spectraldata set that has been dynamically adjusted; identifying, based on thespectrally analyzing the collected at least one spectral data set thathas been dynamically adjusted, one or more isotopes associated with thecontents within the container; identifying materials associated with oneor more of the identified one or more isotopes; comparing the materialsthat have been identified to at least one manifest associated with thecontainer, wherein the at least one manifest lists a set of materialsthat are declared to be within the container; and storing a set ofcomparison results in memory, the set of comparison results beingassociated with the comparing the materials that have been identified tothe at least one manifest associated with the container.
 2. The methodof claim 1, wherein the dynamically adjusting further comprises:selecting one of the plurality of background radiation data; andsubtracting the selected one of the plurality of background radiationdata from the collected at least one spectral data set.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the identifying materials associated with one or moreof the identified one or more isotopes, further comprises: comparing theidentified one or more isotopes to pre-defined one or more isotopesassociated with at least one of a plurality of materials, a plurality ofgoods, and a plurality of products, that are known to comprise anycombination of the pre-defined one or more isotopes; and identifying,based on the comparing the identified one or more isotopes, at least onematerial, good, or product, as likely being in the contents of thecontainer, the at least one material, good, or product, comprising oneor more of the identified one or more isotopes.
 4. The method of claim1, wherein the different background environments comprise at least oneof: water; land; other containers; air; and structures.
 5. A system fordetecting and identifying radioactive materials within one or morecontainers, the system comprising: a plurality of radiation sensorssituated on at least one frame structure configured for at leastlocating the plurality of radiation sensors in proximity to a container,wherein the plurality of radiation sensors are adapted to collect atleast one spectral data set representing radiation data associated withthe container and its contents; and an information processing systemcommunicatively coupled to the plurality of radiation sensors, whereinthe information processing system is configured with computerinstructions for: dynamically adjusting a collected at least onespectral data set from the plurality of radiation sensors, according toat least one of a plurality of background radiation data based on adetermined background environment of a plurality of different backgroundenvironments in proximity to the container; spectrally analyzing thecollected at least one spectral data set that has been dynamicallyadjusted; identifying, based on the spectrally analyzing the collectedat least one spectral data set that has been dynamically adjusted, oneor more isotopes associated with the contents within the container;identifying materials associated with one or more of the identified oneor more isotopes; comparing the materials that have been identified toat least one manifest associated with the container, wherein the atleast one manifest lists a set of materials that are declared to bewithin the container; and storing a set of comparison results in memory,the set of comparison results being associated with the comparing thematerials that have been identified to the at least one manifestassociated with the container.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein thedynamically adjusting further comprises: selecting one of the pluralityof background radiation data; and subtracting the selected one of theplurality of background radiation data from the collected at least onespectral data set.
 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the identifyingmaterials associated with one or more of the identified one or moreisotopes, further comprises: comparing the identified one or moreisotopes to pre-defined one or more isotopes associated with at leastone of a plurality of materials, a plurality of goods, and a pluralityof products, that are known to comprise any combination of thepre-defined one or more isotopes; and identifying, based on thecomparing the identified one or more isotopes, at least one material,good, or product, as likely being in the contents of the container, theat least one material, good, or product, comprising one or more of theidentified one or more isotopes.
 8. The system of claim 5, wherein thedifferent background environments comprise at least one of: water; land;other containers; air; and structures.
 9. A method for detecting andidentifying radioactive materials within one or more containers, themethod comprising: providing a background radiation data set comprisinga plurality of background radiation data corresponding to a plurality ofdifferent background environments in proximity to a container;collecting, by a plurality of radiation sensors, at least one spectraldata set representing radiation data associated with the container andits contents, the container being located in proximity to the pluralityof radiation sensors; dynamically adjusting the collected at least onespectral data set according to at least one of the plurality ofbackground radiation data based on a determined background environmentof the plurality of different background environments in proximity tothe container, the dynamically adjusting including: selecting one of theplurality of background radiation data; and subtracting the selected oneof the plurality of background radiation data from the collected atleast one spectral data set; spectrally analyzing the collected at leastone spectral data set that has been dynamically adjusted; identifying,based on the spectrally analyzing the collected at least one spectraldata set that has been dynamically adjusted, one or more isotopesassociated with the contents within the container; and identifyingmaterials associated with one or more of the identified one or moreisotopes.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the plurality of radiationsensors includes at least one of: a set of gamma sensors; and a set ofsolid-state neutron sensors.
 11. The method of claim 9, furthercomprising: providing a set of histograms corresponding to the at leastone spectral data set, wherein each histogram in the set of histogramsrepresents a different spectral image of radiation associated with thecontainer.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the identifying one ormore isotopes associated with the contents within the container, furthercomprises: comparing each histogram in the set of histograms to aplurality of spectral images, wherein each spectral image represents anisotope; identifying, based on the comparing each histogram, each of theplurality of spectral images that substantially matches at least aportion of a histogram in the set of histograms; and identifying one ormore isotopes associated with the contents within the container, each ofthe identified isotopes being represented by at least one identifiedspectral image that substantially matches at least a portion of ahistogram in the set of histograms.
 13. The method of claim 9, whereinthe identifying materials, further comprises: comparing the identifiedone or more isotopes to pre-defined one or more isotopes associated withat least one of a plurality of materials, a plurality of goods, and aplurality of products, that are known to comprise any combination of thepre-defined one or more isotopes; and identifying, based on thecomparing the identified one or more isotopes, at least one material,good, or product, as likely being in the contents of the container, theat least one material, good, or product, comprising one or more of theidentified one or more isotopes.
 14. The method of claim 9, furthercomprising: determining if an identified material matches at least oneof a set of materials that are declared to be within the container; andnotifying an alarm, in response to determining that at least oneidentified material fails to match any of the at least one of the set ofmaterials that are declared to be within the container.
 15. The methodof claim 9, wherein the identifying one or more isotopes associated withthe contents within the container further comprises: spectrallyanalyzing a spectral image in a histogram representing a compositespectral image associated with the container and the contents within thecontainer; comparing a plurality of spectral images to at least aportion of the spectral image in the histogram, wherein each spectralimage in the plurality of spectral images represents an isotope;identifying, based on the comparing, a first spectral image from theplurality of spectral images that substantially matches at least aportion of the spectral image in the histogram; subtracting theidentified first spectral image from the spectral image in the histogramresulting in a remaining spectral image in the histogram; and repeatingthe comparing, identifying, and subtracting, for each subsequentspectral image in the plurality of spectral images, wherein eachsubsequent spectral image after being identified in at least a portionof the remaining spectral image in the histogram, is then subtractedfrom the remaining spectral image in the histogram.